Archive for the ‘Harlot Beat’ Category

Gospel of Judas: Vatican theologian and devoted Anglican join betrayal of Christ

April 1st, 2007 by David Dansker

mercury2_mariner10.jpg. Credit: NASAA new fictional account of Judas Iscariot actually portrays Judas attempting to save Jesus from crucifixion by making arrangements to smuggle him out of Jerusalem. Written by Anglican Jeffrey Archer, also a best selling British author, and Roman Catholic Francis Maloney, also a Vatican theologist, “The Gospel According to Judas” was premiered on March 20 at the Pontifical Biblical Institute, and a segment of the work was aired on Vatican Radio.[i]

This book also denies several other gospel truths including Jesus performing miracles, and being born of a virgin. To make the deception complete, the work is formatted in chapter and verse, incorporates some story material from the authentic gospels, and is handsomely imitation leather bound. The curious should be warned: these heretical claims are not true, and any time wasted perusing this blasphemy instead of exposing yourself the gospel truth is an eternal-life-threatening danger. 

The lame excuse given by the head of the Pontifical Biblical Institute for presenting the book there sounds remarkable similar to the defense of taking warning labels off poison. The Rev. Stephen Pisano said he hopes it “encourages people to read the Bible.”[ii]

Endorsed by the Vatican, this book is very likely to have the opposite effect, and without having to be read. Every unsaved sinner, though only a heartbeat away from hell, can easily think of reasons not to read Bible. This new hoax bearing the tacit approval of the Catholic Church will only satisfy the sinners’ conviction that the experts on their side of doubt.

Endnotes:


 

[i] Michelle Vu, “New ‘Gospel’ of Judas Book Depicts Betrayer as the Betrayed,”

The Christian Post. March 26, 2007.

http://www.christianpost.com/article/20070326

/26532_New_%27Gospel%27_of_Judas_Book_Depicts

_Betrayer_as_the_Betrayed.htm.

 

[ii] Ibid.

No Longer a Sin: Lust redefined as “inclination”

November 29th, 2006 by David Dansker

sgepbc75241106215757photo00quicklookdefault-245×163.jpgDemonstrating once again how the Nicolaitans are inclined prostrate towards false gods and heresy, the U.S. Catholic bishops has decided homosexuals can not choose to repent, and so are welcomed into their churches (”Catholic bishops tell gays to remain celibate,” Reuters, Nov. 14, 2006).

This sad predicament is the result of their reasoning “that gays and lesbians do not choose their sexual orientation.” But the contortionists lose their balance and fall over when they stretch compromise too thin by stating “homosexual ‘inclinations’ are not in themselves sinful.” The Catholic bishops only ask that they not act on thier inclinations, or remain celibate. Jesus had something decidedly different to say about what these religious leaders are euphemizing as “inclinations.” Here is a salute to scriptures they never read:  

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. (Mat 5:27-28; emphases added)

But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.(Mat 15:18)

For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man. (Mat 15:19-20)

Like the Pharisees, the Nicolaitans are only concerned with external appearances, or whitewashed sepultures. This is the equivalence of admitting homosexuals on their bases of remaining homosexuals, and only requiring them to pledge to celibacy. It’s not, however, a surprising position for an organization to embrace that has also recruited, harbored, and assisted an untold number homosexuals to molest and sexually abuse children. This is the equivalence of admitting homosexuals on their bases of remaining homosexuals; and only requiring them to pledge to celibacy. No doubt some homosexuals will be enticed into accepting this pretense of reconciliation with God, and deal with penance for breaking celibacy as minor inconveniences worth the false sense of security. Anyone else more serious about the real God, no matter what kind of sinner they identify as, should consider this:

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
(1Co 6:9-11; emphases added)

 

If your desire real reconciliationg with God, you too must become a “were” by repenting and turning Christ Jesus. He alone can save you from your sin. In this life, and in the one to come.