Barack Obama Equates Bible-believing Christians to Hijackers

June 25th, 2007 by David Dansker

Hailing from the apostate United Church of Christ, which ordains homosexuals and endorses same-sex marriages, and is pro-abortion; Sen. Barack Obama has lashed out against Bible-believing Christians who oppose these heresies. “I don’t know what Bible they’re reading, but it doesn’t jibe with my version,” Obama said in prepared remarks.

While it is true that there are many spurious translations in use today, most of the heretical doctrines being taught do not stem from them; instead, those bibles are printed after the fact to conform to heresies which are at first contrived by men. Accurate translations make clear the purpose of the different designs in mankind as created by God, the function of one man and one woman in the marriage union, and the sanctity of life while still in the womb.

It is when reprobates no longer make these distinctions that politicians like Obama are raised up who seek the show of religiosity to enhance their own pomposity, and who in turn persecute the faithful for their witness against them. Their tactic is to marginalize the faithful as newly formed radicals who are impediments to existing peace and unity. “Somehow, somewhere along the way,” Obama charges, “faith stopped being used to bring us together and started being used to drive us apart. It got hijacked.”

By this remark Obama reveals that he neither understands the faith, nor can he be numbered amongst its household. The faith which was once delivered unto the saints was never an instrument that God employed to bring people in the world together; it is the result of the power in the Gospel which brings estranged sinners to God, and separates them from this world of sin. This is decidedly not the power coveted by apostate politicians who seek to win the world at the peril of their own souls.

David Dansker

Read about it in Breitbart.com

—-

3 Responses to “Barack Obama Equates Bible-believing Christians to Hijackers”

  1. Gary Aknos Says:

    Violation of church and state?

    Check out full coverage of this at
    http://www.ucctruths.com/

    And send an email to Americans United for the Separation of Church and State (americansunited@au.org) demanding that the UCC lose it’s 501(3(c) tax exempt status because:

    From the Americans United for the Separation of Church and State perspective, a political speaker at a religious event has one of two distinct roles: Either they are 1) speaking as a candidate for office or 2) speaking as a non-candidate. If Obama was speaking as a non-candidate (since he was supposedly invited over a year ago before he declared) then his reference to campaign pledges if elected to office clearly violates AU’s standard for separation. If he was speaking as a candidate, AU’s standards call for equal access by the other candidates for the same office… which didn’t appear to happen. In either case, his speeches before the Iowa Conference and the General Synod were a violation of separation by AU’s own standards.

    From the UCC perspective, there should be no confusion as they publicly advocate for the same rules on separation as AU. Furthermore, UCC leaders and conference ministers understood Obama’s status as a declared candidate for some time and, by virtue of their reporting on the Iowa speech a week earlier, also understood that Obama’s address would be a campaign speech. The UCC clearly and knowingly violated AU’s standard for separation.

  2. admin Says:

    Gary,

    thank you for the informative commentary, I am going to check out the link that you provided,

    David

  3. David Dansker Says:

    Gary, it’s going to take me some time to get back to that UCC website,

    David

Leave a Reply