News Snippets From All Beats

Superman: Man has thought he has become powerful enough to destroy the world in his own time; man must become powerful enough to save it in his own eyes.

Several articles have appeared here chronicling the global warming hoax and the motivations for perpetuating that hoax. Many developments in the scandal have made the news lately, and the unraveling of the fraudulent science and associated conspiracies has been rapid fire.  The following link is provided here for a concise topical overview:

Copenhagen and “ClimateGate“

Home appliances will soon start taking their orders over the internet from a central utility manager under government control.  By installing in-home boxes the size of cable television receivers, utility managers can set electricity consumption rates for districts, neighborhoods, and houses.  Using software being developed by IBM, instructions can be remotely given to command thermostats to change settings, or shut down HVAC’s completely.  Touted will be the advantages of saving energy and the ability to switch to renewable sources as they come online, and customizing homes to occupant preferences.  For instance, rooms will automatically adjust lighting to match the identity profile of the person entering the room (which also means your whereabouts can be tracked at all times).

This illusion of control will be the trade off for surrendering all of it.  When the green evangelists begin requiring worship as a condition to receive power from mother earth, a person won’t be able to turn on so much as a light without complying.  How soon power utilities will be used as a political state tool is arguable, but the technology will be implemented soon.  Companies like IBM stand to make a fortune in Smart Energy Technology (SET).  President Obama’s stimulus package contains 10 billion for SET, and that does not include the future sales and service of all the equipment that will be required for homes and entire power grids.  Further guaranteeing windfall profits, this equipment will be required by federal law.

With the President handing out billions unabated by a Congress that’s gone swimming in the pork barrel, and the Federal Reserve making secret trillion dollar loans to people they refuse to identify, for terms they refuse disclose, the printing presses can’t keep up.  The tailor made solution for these irresponsible socialists  is the fairy tale of global warming.  This is where the citizens are blamed for climate change and then bled to death with taxes so that the spending and the fascist takeover can continue.  Put another way: a one hundred percent profit for selling something that doesn’t exist, and passing laws which force everyone to buy it.   Here comes Energy and Climate Czar Carol Browner (always loved those Russian titles on American bureaucrats) to collect 2 Trillion for the environment.¹

The Green Evangelists and the Green Reich can be counted on to sing their hymns to Obama over the cry from the bloodletting, but this pretense that these are only taxes won’t last very long.

With the world economy crashing, even Russia is ready to throw in the ruble and is pushing for a world currency now.  Why? Lets look at it from the dollar’s perspective.  The American dollar is only backed by a promise to pay, and supported by the faith of its holders.  With equity and pension and retirement funds having vaporized in the last few months, that faith is vanishing too.  A one world currency would put all politicians and tyrants in a unique position as it would be backed by fear.  There would be no escaping, and no looking back to bring those in government responsible for this melt down to justice, and, more importantly, no corrections to ensure that freedom continues.

It would be illegal in a one world currency to barter or trade in anything other than the official currency, and penalties would include confiscation of wealth and property.  A one world currency would also be a great equalizer, or an irresistible opportunity to for the reigning socialists to redistribute wealth.  The assets conversions codes would be written in such a way as to transfer most private wealth and property to the hands of government, and leave everyone equally poor, and starving, and communists.  At last.  Now here’s change we can heave in.

^1. Tom LoBianco, “Obama Climate Plan Could Cost $2 Trillion,” Wahsington Times, March 18, 2009.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/18/obama-climate-plan-could-cost-2-trillion/

Here is how it would work: 1) huge new green taxes are to be levied on everyone and everything that moves or stands still. 2) the money goes to Washington for politicians to spend it on stimulus packages to bail out businesses that have gone broke because of the cost the new taxes have added to doing business. 3) this further stains on the economy causing industry to implode and collapse. 4) the dramatically reduced industrial activity has no affect on climate change due to the main factors responsible: such as volcanic activity, cyclical changes in ocean temperature, and the influences from outside the solar system such as the impact that cosmic rays have on cloud production.  5) politicians determine the reason for failing to control the climate is that taxes were not high enough, and the new little ice age we are experiencing is more global warming.

You can get this ridicules stuff here, or you can get from people who work at NASA.  No joke.  According to NASA scientist Jim Hansen, a leading climate expert, Barack Obama has only four years to save the earth, and he is calling for the precipitous actions outlined above by demanding step one be taken immediately.

Economy - The federal budget deficit will climb to $1.2 trillion dollars this year.  President-elect Obama is pledging to provide an economic stimulus package starting at $775 billion (before Congress ratchets it upwards from there), and that is not counted yet towards the deficit.  With the proposed tax cuts and spending programs, where is the money going to come from?  One approach to keeping the spigot running without running the printing presses overnight would be to put the money in one pocket and then take it out of the other pocket.

Cutting income taxes would temporally free up disposable income, but the government could recoup the revenue by implementing Green taxes by which it could regain the tax cuts at every transaction.  Things are so bad that the government may even start collecting the Green taxes at no transaction at all.  The FDA is currently proposing a greenhouse gas tax on livestock due to the fact that they produce carbon dioxide and methane gas, and this would be passed on in food prices.  Interestingly, people also fall into this greenhouse gas-production category, and a tax on breathing would arguably be far more insidious than the income tax.

Global Warming - “President-elect Barack Obama appears to have picked physicist-turned-environmental policy expert John Holdren as his science adviser.” This is the same physicist-turned-Green Reich zealot who said in Scientific American: “The ongoing disruption of the earth’s climate by man-made greenhouse gases is already well beyond dangerous and is careening toward completely unmanageable.”  What do we need to do to manage under this hot-air?  “There is now reason to hope,” Holdren opined on Obama’s pending election to president, “however, that this country is about to shift from shameful foot-dragging into the leadership role that the world needs and expects.”  Less shameful foot-dragging, more enthusiastic heel-clicking on the way.

Global Warming - “You know, to think that we could affect weather all that much is pretty arrogant,” says Chad Myers, meteorologist, at CNN.  He is right on target: the idea of global warming and its accompanying prescriptive cure appeals to the arrogance of self-righteous man.  The bull’s-eye, however, is the ensuing control these arrogant politicians are gaining over the lives of the masses through enacting green measures.  They are relieving citizens of both their rights and their money in this world-wide scam.

The U.S. Department of Interior made history this afternoon by invoking the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to protect the polar bear from global warming. This is the first time the ESA has been used to protect a species from human generated CO2, and the implications bode ominous for the human race. While there are said to be provisions in the designation that will offer protections to power companies and other businesses,¹ it is unlikely that individual consumers will be afforded protection from this sweeping legislation.

Ostensibly, motorists could be forced to have their vehicles fitted with monitoring devices that record aggressive green-house driving habits and relay that data to federal agencies that could, in turn, mail out citations to drivers in the same way that speeders get ticketed by red light cameras. Even before these evasive controls are implemented, a new ESA tax could be added at the gas pump to modify driver behavior. Of course, this is only speculation

Yet, the probability of these federally mandated causes and effects are much clearer to trace than the murky science behind claims that the polar bear is endangered; even from natural climate cycles, much less from anthropomorphically induced global warming.

Notes:

^1. H. Josef Hebert, “US lists polar bear as threatened species,” Breitbart.com, May 14, 2008.

2. DOI News Release: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D90LJ4BO2&show_article=1

Residents in Denver, Colorado have been participating in a voluntary program to reduce vehicle CO2 emissions. Two transmission devices using a cellular telephone network to transmit driving data are installed on the car. Driver behavior is then tracked and sent to servers and recorded to generate driver profiles. After a month, drivers can access a secure server to see how “driving habits contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.”¹ These devices have already been installed on all Denver city and county vehicles.

The devices measure “aggressive driving, engine idling, and speeding.”² The stated goal of the program is to identify aggressive green-house driving and modify that behavior. “Denver’s bet is that its citizens are eager to participate in this Community-based program to address the global warming problem.”³ It’s a bet they’ve hedged with propaganda and high-tech to cash in on coming new green-house violation surcharges to be added to traffic tickets. As more and more cities look for ways of balancing budgets with new taxes and fees, look for more green-house voluntary programs like these to be initiated and then converted to vehicle codes.

Notes:

^1. Denver Colorado, “Driving Change…Denver: Reduce Your Vehicular CO2 Emissions,” (overview). February 2008.

https://www.drivingchange.org/Downloads/DC_datasheet_012908.pdf

^2-3. Denver Colorado, “Driving Change…Denver: Reduce Your Vehicular CO2 Emissions,” (whitepaper). February 2008.

https://www.drivingchange.org/Downloads/DC_whitepaper_program.pdf

The first jackboot of Global Warming fanaticism hit the floor down under when Australian professor Barry Walters revealed plans for penalizing people who refused to circumscribe their lives by the doomsday theory of global warming. As is usually the case when political factions can’t win the day with facts, they campaign to force their views through punitive taxation coupled with special exemptions for extraordinary compliance. Thus Walter’s $800 annual carbon tax per child for families who surpassed the states two-child limit could be offset by carbon credits earned from voluntary sterilization.¹

Since the Walters leak last December global warming faithful have been scrambling for a microphone and an outrageous new proposal to make. While the competition has been fierce, it appears that New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has pulled ahead of the pack by renewing his call for global carbon taxation, and adding new penalties for suspected global warmers.

The mayor pitched his worldwide carbon tax plan at the UN’s “Addressing Climate Change: the United Nations and the world at Work” conference. There were few surprises in his call for the UN to punitively tax countries, including America, to create an incentive for them to tow the global warming party line (he wants Americans to levy the tax on themselves, and then turn the revenues over to the UN). The other boot dropped, however, when Bloomberg began drawing parallels between suspected global warmers and terrorists.

Bloomberg likened suspected global warmers to terrorists as having “the same potentials of destroying the planet we live on.”² While the mayor used the tactic of place card switching, substituting the verb of global warming for the people actually in his cross hairs, his vociferous call to action against those who fail to subscribe to the theory of global warming must have been unmistakable to the crowd at the UN. Then Bloomberg got to the point in his discursive sophistry which was to declare hunting season on these enemies of the UN State. “We should go after terrorists every place in this world, find them and kill them, plain and simple,” said the rising master of double entendre.³ To make sure his double meaning was not lost, Bloomberg artfully avoided mentioning that the real terrorists are Muslim, and this no doubt gave the UN despots some villains they could finally draw sabers against.

Quick to lace up and jump on board with Bloomberg in the hunt for suspected warmers was airline mogul Richard Branson, owner of Virgin Atlantic Airways. Branson pledged the financial might of his Luftwaffe, to the tune of $25 million, for scientists to find a “solution” for heading off the impending environmental catastrophe.⁴

This search for a final solution seems to be an eerily recurring theme in the Green Reich, and Branson might be letting slip that he is poised for military maneuvers, of sorts. In what may be an effort to unleash his air force by official UN sanction, Branson hinted at the formation of a global UN situation room form where, presumably, targets could be assessed and air strikes could be launched. “We need a war room,” Branson told the UN attendees, who by that time must have set in rapt euphoria, listening to celebrities and members in United States government competing to find out who could click their heels the loudest. It will be interesting to see in the next round of fanaticism how heil they can go.

Notes:

^1. David Dansker, “‘Final Solution’ looms in Global Warming Madness,”TheNewsBeats.com, New Snippets FAB, December 20, 2007. http://www.laodiceannewsbeat.com/news/?p=70

^2. Benny Avni, “Mayor Compares Threat of Global Warming to Terrorism,” New York Sun, February 13, 2008.

http://www.nysun.com/article/71103

^3. Ibid.

^4. Ibid.

Briton’s Environmental Agency has issued guidelines for what to do in an emergency arising from exposure to toxic mercury. This threat is deemed immanent due to British environmental laws forcing the replacement of tungsten bulbs with Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs, or CFL’s, by 2014.¹ Exposure could result when a CFL is broken, releasing 6 to 8 micrograms of mercury.

Mercury exposure from CLF’s will pose a risk to existing medical conditions such as skin and repertory ailments, and can also cause migraine headaches. Health officials are concerned over mercury because repeated and long-term exposure can cause damage to the nervous system, the kidneys, and eventually result in birth defects. A level considered hazardous starts at about 2.8 micrograms in blood test results (2.8 ug/dL).²

This warning from across the pond is of interest to Americans where similar legislation enacted last month virtually replaces the incandescent light bulb with CFL’s in all American households by 2020.

Interestingly, a study published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons in 2006 showed that an increase in mercury-containing vaccines administered in the 1990’s increased neurological disorders in children, including autism which “skyrocketed.”³

Precautions to mercury toxicity include evacuating a broken CFL site for at least 15 minutes, using rubber gloves and sealable plastic bags for cleanup, and avoiding any activity that might contribute to the toxin remaining airborne, such as using a vacuum cleaner. After cleanup, all residues must be taken to an official recycling station.

The mandated death to the incandescent bulb is another example of how Environmentalists continue to profit by the Global Warming message of doom at the expense of the public’s health. The cost of special handling for disposed CFL’s in Briton currently hovers at $1,300 per recycling bin.

Notes:

^1. WorldNetDaily, January 8, 2008.

^2. New Jersey Department of Health

^3. WorldNetDaily, March 3, 2006.

For the Global Warming faithful, technology and religious fervor are combining to provide new means for adulation. In order to reduce carbon emissions caused by jet travel, Prince Charles will attend the upcoming World Future Energy Summit in Abu Dhabi via hologram. His three dimensional image will be beamed to the stage and deliver a five minute talk, thus marking a first for the royal family, and pleasing environmentalists.

Charles is not the first world figure to employ the technique of reduction and reanimation. Last year Al Gore made a holographic appearance at a Live Earth gathering at Whembley Stadium.

That the religious faithful of environmentalism readily receive their Icons in obvious simulation, at what amounts to their worship services, is telling for the condition of the world.

Technology and human behavior are showing Bible prophecy to be less a product of metaphysical language and symbolism, and more the literal word of God; explicitly detailing the future. Bible passages that were once wondered at with some perplexity now seem to specify circumstances and events that fallen religious man will easily acclimate to.

Prophecy speaks of two world leaders who are yet to come on the stage of human history and rule by both civil and religious authority. One of them will serve the other in capacity of prophet, magnifying him with miracles:

And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. (Rev 13:14)

His boss, identified as the Antichrist, will have survived an assassination attempt prompting this religious display. And just as members to the Green Reich are mandating their observances into law today, penalties will also be established for dissidents in the near future:

And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. (Rev 13:15)

Many in Christendom allegorize these end-time prophecies found in The Revelation, or claim that they were fulfilled by the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 by the Romans. But the reality of unfolding world events continues to contradict that view. While no one knows the identity of the coming two leaders, the world is proving ready to follow them when they are finally revealed.

Source: here

A new energy law effectively kills the incandescent light bulb by replacing it with Compact Fluorescent Light bulbs by the year 2020. By no coincidence, General Electric and Phillip’s stocks both spiked several percentage points on the day the bill passed by the Senate.¹ It turns out that GE manufactures the CLF’s in China, paying far less for labor than it does manufacturing the incandescent bulb here in the United States.

The CFL’s are supposed to be much more efficient than the incandescent, making them the easy choice for meeting the 70% more efficient standard set by the new law,² but this federal incursion into private homes on a premise still unproven, Global Warming, is particularly repugnant.

Firstly, the CFL’s contain mercury.³ It is ironic that lead has been outlawed from paint only to subject the citizenry to another poison. Secondly, it is insulting to Americans, who have proven track record in conservation and recycling, for the Federal government to pass a mandate expressing the government’s lack of confidence in citizens being able to achieve efficiency by other means. To wit, turning off lights when not in use, and using bulbs appropriate for a task.

Not shaving off enough percentage points yet? Try this: a dimmer switch. That’s what enables all those bulbs to make our rooms look so good in the indirect and track lighting we will no longer be able to use. For an idea of how efficient controlled lighting can be (controlled by the home owner, that is), we sent the staff at TheNewsBeats.com out shopping (they were on a roll, anyway). Here is some of what they found.

A 65 watt, 120 volt, flood light bulb will provide 65 watts of lighting for 2000 hours, but the 65 watt, 130 volt flood will provide 57 watts lighting for 5000 hours. The principal seems to be that the bulb designed for the beefed-up 130v wiring and then used on the 120v wiring (in most residential housing) lasts significantly longer while producing light that is reduced by only 8 watts.

With this in mind, consider that the actual use of most recessed and track lighting is governed by a dimmer switch that typically reduces the wattage of a 65 watt flood to around 40 watts and less (these are, admittedly, casual observations). Even without attempting back-engineering formulas, it’s not a stretch to suppose that most of the 70% of increased efficiency mandated by the new bulb law is already being met, and exceeded.

Well, this happy news was not lost on our shoppers, and TheNewsBeats.com is now stock full of all manner of incandescent bulbs. Oh, the warm glow of a 65 watt flood in a room, and the way that a 65 watt spot lays across a page of text, and that crystal clarity of those 40 and 60 watt clear bulbs. Yep, things are going to be a lot brighter around here in the coming New Year, and as always, more efficient.

[Editor’s note: This story is filled under Levity, synonymous for “lighthearted,” as opposed to the “darkhearted,” who would have us all set in the dark with them.]

Notes:

^1. Planet Gore, “How Many Lobbyists,” NRO nationalreviewonline

http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/ (accessed December 28, 2007).

^2. Josiah Ryan, “Reid: Banning Incandescent Bulb Appropriate Federal Act,” CNSNews.com, December 20, 2007.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=

/Politics/archive/200712/POL20071220f.html

^3. Planet Gore, “Lobbyists.”

Details of a final solution plan are surfacing as Global Warming insiders break silence and go public with the methods of choice for ushering in a Green Reich. Professor Barry Walters of Australia leaked particulars of the radical agenda that includes a birth levy of $5,000 and an annual carbon tax of $800 thereafter for families exceeding two children.

But that may be only the tip of the “greenhouse-friendly”¹ living conditions to be enforced on wayward humans who are “profligate”² consumers before the goddess Gaia. Other services will be offered to allow the irreverent to earn carbon credits and will include credits for voluntarily undergoing sterilization.

Ostensibly, parents who are unable to meet the tax burdens will have their children confiscated and terminated, and then be forced to undergo sterilization themselves. No word yet on the amount of carbon credits earned during this penalty phase of greenhouse-friendly service.

Notes:

^1,2. source: here

Americans may be willing to risk having some small, still unproven, effect on climate change, and suffer the consequences. But what if driving to work and eating meat meant killing scores of innocent people every day in Darfur?

Global Warming theorists are wagering that this sort of second-hand smoke connection to Global Warming can be just as successful in ushering in restrictive laws, punitive fines, and taxes as the one that was used so successfully against cigarettes.

Of course, it’s a smoke screen. Climate change happens, but Global Warming (human induced warming) is a political tool of Green Evangelicals. They hope to gain many forced conversions misrepresenting the motivating force behind evil murderers. Wicked and depraved murderers murder not because there is a drought on, but because they are evil murderers.

Note: not all Green Evangelicals make use the cross as a religious symbol, but they all worship the same goddess: Gaia. They will also all utilize the power of the UN to mandate their sacraments.

David Dansker

Read about in Breitbart.com