Because it hasn’t happened, and according to the global warming conspirators’ predictive time line we can tell that it’s not going to happen, now would be a good time to reflect on exactly what anthropogenic global warming was supposed to be. Global warming was something we were destined to witness, experience, and suffer under if we didn’t obey every word that came out of Al Gore’s mouth, give all our money to the UN, and go agrarian (greens eating greens). Americans were decried as the obstructionists who were in large part responsible for impending doom because we wouldn’t knuckle under and commit civilizational suicide.
So what was global warming supposed to do, that is be doing, by now? Christopher Booker at the Telegraph.uk in England reminded his readers a few days ago that the fear mongers and conspirators threatened climate change on the order of “the destruction of Himalayan glaciers and Amazonian rainforest; famine in Africa; fast-rising sea levels; the threat of hurricanes, droughts, floods and heatwaves all becoming more frequent.”1 None of these climate changes are happening as the warmists claimed they would, and some activity, such as falling sea levels and the occurrence of hurricanes are actually moving in the opposite direction from their predictions. Booker takes time to point some of this out because the exposed conspirators are attempting to wiggle.
The contention is being heard from some that just because they got a few of the facts wrong, the science is, as the EPA recently put it, “settled.”2 Americans owe a debt of gratitude to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli for who is suing the EPA in court over that ‘settled’ science to block the EPA from using it to ruin our lives.3
We also owe the English newspapers for keeping the heat on the warmists and getting the facts out in what is the biggest scandal in history. It is not merely matter of warmists getting a few facts wrong; it is the discovery that conspirators knowingly suppressed evidence that refuted their climate claims, acted to prevent other scientists from having their studies that contradicted global warming from being published, manipulated computer models to get the results they wanted, and did all of this in order to lie to the world to get the political and financial policies they desired for prestige and profit. That is what global warming was.
Notes:
1. Christopher Booker, “A perfect storm is brewing for the IPCC,” Telegraph.co.uk, February 27, 2010. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7332803/A-perfect-storm-is-brewing-for-the-IPCC.html
2. Molly Henneberg, “EPA, Countering Critics of Greenhouse Gas Findings, Says ‘Science Is Settled,” FOXNews.com, February 19, 2010.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/19/epa-countering-critics-greenhouse-gas-findings-says-science-settled/
3. Rex Springston, “Va. challenges EPA’s stance on global warming,” Richmond Times-Dispatch, February 17, 2010. http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/article/CUCC17_20100216-222005/324766/